Introduction

Since the 1970s, issues like climate negotiations, water wars, environmental migrations, and energy controversies have underscored how environmental regulations have become an unprecedented focal point in international relations. This shift is also evident in post-disaster management, where the multiplicity of actors and environmental concerns necessitates coordinated and transnational approaches. Since the 1980s, disaster management has taken on geopolitical significance, drawing global attention. Governments, international organizations, and NGOs play a critical role in disaster relief, addressing immediate needs such as food, water, and medical supplies. Humanitarian intervention, peacekeeping efforts, and post-disaster reconstruction have expanded since the 1990s, increasingly involving non-state and international actors. So-called natural disasters present complex challenges affecting various societal levels, with vulnerable populations—often with limited financial resources—bearing the brunt of these crises despite their minimal contribution to climate change.

This course will explore diverse aspects of international relations through the lenses of disaster management and international environmental policy. It will examine the variety of actors and strategies involved, highlighting that international relations extend beyond state-to-state interactions to include transnational relations involving non-state actors such as NGOs, international organizations, private foundations, and multinational corporations. In the field of disaster management, the influence of these actors is particularly pronounced. The growing presence of non-state actors in international relations can be attributed to several factors, including weakened national allegiances, increased transparency within international organizations, advancements in communication, and governments entrusting non-state actors with policy implementation, particularly in developing countries.

This course addresses international relations by integrating multiple perspectives to analyze complex phenomena through disaster management and international environmental policy. By examining climate negotiations, water wars, environmental migrations, and energy controversies, it draws from disciplines such as political science, economics, sociology, and environmental studies. It investigates the diversity of actors involved, including governments, NGOs, international organizations, private foundations, and multinational corporations.

By highlighting the dynamics of international relations and the diverse array of actors in disaster management, this course incorporates knowledge from fields such as humanitarian aid, development, vulnerability reduction, environmental protection, energy, and security. This multidisciplinary approach offers a deeper understanding of how different factors and actors interact to shape disaster responses and international environmental policies.

Evaluation

Critical essay and active participation

  1. Critical essay (70%)

Students are required to complete an in-depth academic essay on a topic related to the themes addressed in the course (e.g., resilience, environmental governance, environmental security).

 

Key requirements:

  • Problematized introduction: A clear introduction identifying a specific issue, formulating a relevant research question, and justifying its importance.
  • Literature review: An analysis of existing academic works, identifying the main approaches, concepts, and debates surrounding the chosen topic.
  • Theoretical framework: The use of a theory or set of concepts to structure the analysis and interpret data or arguments.
  • Arguments and discussion: An analytical and critical response to the research question, supported by evidence from secondary research or concrete examples.
  • Conclusion: A synthesis of findings and reflections on implications for policy or future research.
  • Format: The essay must be 5,000 words (±10%), adhere to academic standards (citations, bibliography, and clear writing).

 

Main objective:

To develop students' analytical and critical thinking skills by encouraging deep reflection on complex issues while employing theoretical and conceptual tools studied during the course.

Timeline:

  • Submit the topic and research question for approval mid-semester.
  • Final submission at the end of the semester.

 

  1. Continuous assessment: active participation (30%)

Throughout the semester, students are expected to actively and meaningfully participate during sessions.

 

Assessment criteria:

  • Relevant contributions: Ability to ask questions, comment on the topics covered, and enrich debates.
  • Debates and discussions: Contributions to end-of-class discussions with clear and well-informed arguments.
  • Collaboration: Constructive interaction with peers and respect for differing opinions.
Main objective:

To foster an interactive learning environment that stimulates critical discussion and perspective- building on the concepts studied while developing essential oral skills.

Evaluation breakdown:

  • Critical essay: 70%
  • Active participation: 30%

 This evaluation system balances deep, structured reflection (through written work) with dynamic classroom interaction, promoting both theoretical understanding and practical engagement.